In today’s cloud-native world, building private networks across clouds is no longer a rare edge case—it’s the new default for modern architecture. Whether you’re connecting AWS to Azure, running hybrid on-prem to cloud systems, or managing multi-region failover, the underlying routing protocol becomes a critical design decision.
This article compares BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), OSPF (Open Shortest Path First), and a BGP alternative—noBGP, in the context of building secure, scalable private networks across clouds.
Routing protocols are rulesets used by routers to decide how to forward packets in a network. They fall into two broad categories:
Each has a different method for determining the best path and different operational characteristics. Let’s explore.
BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) is the de facto EGP used on the Internet and in most cloud networking scenarios. It’s a path vector protocol that maintains routes between Autonomous Systems (AS)—each representing a different administrative domain like an ISP, cloud provider, or enterprise.
OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is a link-state routing protocol designed for use within a single administrative domain. It calculates the shortest path using Dijkstra’s algorithm and maintains a full map of the network topology.
noBGP is a modern BGP alternative designed specifically for cloud-native, private networking. Rather than relying on traditional routing protocols like BGP or OSPF, noBGP uses intent-based policies, encrypted overlays, and agent-based routing to connect workloads across clouds.
Where BGP requires public IPs, tunnels, or VPNs, noBGP enables private-to-private communication across any network environment—public cloud, on-prem, edge—without touching the public internet.
RIP (Routing Information Protocol) is one of the oldest distance-vector protocols. It uses hop count as its only metric, with a max of 15 hops—making it unsuitable for anything but the simplest networks.
Why it’s outdated: RIP has been largely replaced by OSPF and BGP due to poor scalability and slow convergence.
FeatureBGPOSPFnoBGPTypeExterior (EGP)Interior (IGP)Overlay Policy EngineUse CaseInter-AS, Cloud RoutingEnterprise LANPrivate multi-cloud overlayConvergence SpeedSlowFastInstantPublic IP RequiredYesSometimesNoEnd-to-End EncryptionNo (requires IPsec/MPLS)NoYesNAT TraversalManual (VPNs, tunnels)LimitedAutomaticScaleInternet-scaleRegionalGlobal via mesh overlayComplexityHighMediumLow (policy-based)PortTCP 179IP Protocol 89Agent-based, no open ports
Traditional BGP routing will remain essential for inter-AS traffic on the open internet. OSPF will continue to thrive in datacenter cores and LANs. But for connecting workloads across clouds, neither protocol meets modern demands for speed, security, or simplicity.
noBGP offers a compelling alternative: programmable, encrypted, and intent-driven connectivity that adapts to developer and business needs, not the limitations of 30-year-old protocols.
If you’re building cross-cloud private networks and tired of managing tunnels, NAT, VPNs, and static routes, it may be time to explore a new path with noBGP.
TL;DR